tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7580595753456307919.post1130986615843327181..comments2023-10-29T12:03:31.248+01:00Comments on Isis' Wardrobe: Extant stays from the 17th centuryIsishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09380497568603304818noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7580595753456307919.post-23094178502322962842013-09-21T13:24:13.950+02:002013-09-21T13:24:13.950+02:00Drea: I have Heard of them, but I hadn't seen ...Drea: I have Heard of them, but I hadn't seen the article. Thank you!Isishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09380497568603304818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7580595753456307919.post-10864073932805624092013-09-20T16:21:12.638+02:002013-09-20T16:21:12.638+02:00Have you heard of the Sittingbourne Stays, dated f...Have you heard of the Sittingbourne Stays, dated from 1620-1630s? They were recently discovered: http://www.concealedgarments.org/2010/10/sittingbourne-cache/<br />Dreahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02121345318027665669noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7580595753456307919.post-86382682586006571972011-12-01T14:39:22.794+01:002011-12-01T14:39:22.794+01:00Alex>: I couldn't agree more!Alex>: I couldn't agree more!Isishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09380497568603304818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7580595753456307919.post-64484422449882577942011-11-29T00:50:11.526+01:002011-11-29T00:50:11.526+01:00Fashion history is so interesting!
xxFashion history is so interesting!<br />xxAlexandrahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18069034136835920569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7580595753456307919.post-72865833623105494572011-11-05T15:20:41.104+01:002011-11-05T15:20:41.104+01:00Thank you! I guess the fabric may be 17th century ...Thank you! I guess the fabric may be 17th century even if the stays aren't, but I agree that some may very well be earlier. And of course, fashions didn't just turn on their heel just because a new century came around. :)Isishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09380497568603304818noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7580595753456307919.post-62325748073319090062011-11-05T03:39:44.097+01:002011-11-05T03:39:44.097+01:00There are a few stays at the Met that I think are ...There are a few stays at the Met that I think are from the 17th (or very, very early 18th) century, based on the cut: <a href="www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/80003630" rel="nofollow">here</a>, <a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/80013051" rel="nofollow">here</a>, <a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/80013126" rel="nofollow">here</a>, <a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/80013053" rel="nofollow">here</a>, <a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/80013065" rel="nofollow">here</a>, and <a href="http://www.metmuseum.org/Collections/search-the-collections/80013123" rel="nofollow">here</a>. I might be wrong, I'm not the best with dating fabrics, but they look 17th century to me, especially around the shoulders.Cassidyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03596345781746342408noreply@blogger.com